The Challenge of Consumerism

In the book “The Missional Church in Context” edited by Craig Van Gelder, there is a discussion about the changing world we are ministering in. In the heyday of denominationalism, we would look at a growing community, and ask whether we had one of our congregations there. If we didn’t, we would designate the location a “domestic mission field”, and we would start up a congregation there and encourage it to grow. Where to place a congregation was decided by asking questions such as Are there people of our denomination living there? Do Roman Catholics have a parish there? How about the Methodists and the Episcopalians? Finding a space for a localized franchise of the denomination’s brand was deemed a relatively easy task. Even easier to answer was the question of what kind of ministry the new congregation would offer.

The answer to that question was quite simple: everything. Anything and everything that a Christian congregation ever would or could offer was to be the ministry program of that new congregation. What would make it different from other congregations would be its denominational branding. So, all congregations would offer the same ministries of worship, education for children, youth ministry, and fellowship and service opportunities for adults. The differences between them would be those that reside within the confessional traditions of the congregations. This was the main pattern until the late 1970s and early 1980s.

Over the last several decades, however, something has changed in the ecclesiastical landscape of the United States. Although the decline of denominationalism is part of the change, the change is much broader than that. Various thinkers have suggested that the change is characterized by a “flight from authority” to “small group renaissance” to conservative, nondenominational communions. While these descriptions of the direction churches have taken may be accurate to a point, the major change over the past three decades may be summed up in one word: CONSUMERISM. Religion in the United States went from something into which one was born to something that one chose. Religious faith and belief went from being a family and communal heirloom into a product that was treated like any other product in the market place. Religion became a consumer product. And when it did, the ecclesiastical landscape changed.

For the missional congregation, the change has brought about significant opportunities as well as significant challenges. One opportunity is that there is a new freedom in no longer being constrained by tradition. But the corresponding challenge that comes with this is that the very things tradition brought with it, now must be asserted, defined, and discerned. This includes determining everything else that goes along with choosing a product rather than accepting a given heritage, including how those on the margins of the community fare. The missional congregation undoubtedly must now work harder to maintain where it is than any congregation did before the advent of consumerism.

It is more difficult to minister within a congregation today than it used to be. It is no longer enough to provide worship for our own people in the ways the tradition has come down to us. Now we must view worship as the means by which people can receive enough value to retain their loyalty to our congregation. It is no longer enough to provide care and concern for people who are members. Now we must make care and concern available to all people, regardless of their status in the community. It is no longer enough to push the latest denominational program or ministry. Now we must provide programs and ministries that connect to people and their lives. This has led to a great change in the ecclesiastical landscape across all contexts and communities in North America. Ministry becomes more challenging with each passing year.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “The Challenge of Consumerism”

  1. Sande Rajcic Says:

    Some of these challenges force us into the arms of the Almighty, which cannot help but be a good thing.

    Some of these challenges force us on a collision course with our older members who joined our church under the previous franchise (church as tradition/heirloom). For many of these senior members, changes, especially in worship, are experienced as a betrayal of trust. As one friend put it to me: “Everything is changing all around me – I need church to be the one oasis of stability that I can count on to be the same.” For some, our unchanging God is not discernible apart from an unchanging worship. We must take care that we do more for our traditionalists than keep up a traditional service on Sunday morning.

  2. clarkcowden Says:

    Sande,
    This is one of the challenges of this transitional, inbetween time that we are living in. We are trying to minister to the heirloomers and the consumers at the same time, trying to help the traditions come alive or stay alive, without caving into the negative side effects of consumerism. We are anchored to the Rock and geared to the times.

  3. Sande Rajcic Says:

    Clark –
    I like the image you present – “anchored to the Rock, and geared to the times.” It reminds me of your presentation awhile back, in which you spoke of the importance of shifting into “neutral” when changing gears. Perhaps it’s time to revisit the wisdom in that presentation.

    Perhaps, also, it is time to admit that a portion of our “heirloomers” may not be glory bound.

    I have had the privilege of ministering the gospel to a woman in her late 80’s who had attended our church for decades prior to moving into an assisted living facility. In the last year, a grass-roots bible study has started among the residents, causing my friend to bring all manner of questions to me. When I asked her once what she had learned on a particular topic in her churchgoing days, she looked at me without the slightest trace of embarrassment and explained that “Well, church was what you got up and dressed for on Sundays, and then, you know, well, we went to brunch.” That is not an atypical experience among those who are not and never have been asking the consumer question: What am I getting out of church?

    My friend is finding the good news in an activity room that she did not find in our sanctuary. There is no brunch. There are no longtime friends to greet. There are no dress clothes to wear. Had there been bible studies exactly like the one she’s attending now offered at our church during the time she was a regular attendee, she would not have gone to them – they would’ve interfered with brunch! But in a lonely place, where only God’s solace to turn to, the bible study is now a precious opportunity not to be missed for anything. My friend is bound for glory. How many of her brunch-bunch remain in darkness, I cannot say.

  4. clarkcowden Says:

    Sande,
    Thanks for sharing an important story. It’s too bad when you hear about churches where dressing up and going out for brunch were more important than knowing Christ and participating in the mission of God. Some churches have great traditions that they pass down and some have sad traditions. We need to keep the former and jettison the latter. But, that often takes changing the culture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: